How
to describe “my” style? Not tweet, not
meme, not text message. Somewhere I read
a poet’s work described as “epigrammatic and compressed” I like that. Somewhere else, somebody else, “conceptual, minimalist.”
Craig
Dworkin wrote about Kenneth Goldsmith's “phatic back-channel fillers and voiced pauses that
punctuate messages (all the ums and ahs and uh-huhs)” and Christian Bok
described a robot’s poetry as “syntactically orthodox, but semantically
aberrant.” I go there sometimes,
too.
In
fact, Christian Bok was reviewing something called RACTER, an automated
algorithm that “gives voice to its own electric delirium.” The robot’s poem
quoted below is hard to beat, robot or human being:
“This
dissertation will show that the love
of
a man and a woman is not the love
of
steak and lettuce.”
So
is this one:
“A
tree or shrub can grow and bloom.
I
am always the same.
But
I am clever.”
However,
in the course of the review, there are 15 other examples, none of which rise
above the level of a journeyman enjamber.
So, I don’t fear automation.
No comments:
Post a Comment